The court considered whether each of these clauses were reasonable under the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta and therefore. Specifically, they will be aware of section 31 which, in businesstobusiness contracts, requires exclusion clauses that form part of written standard terms of business to be reasonable. Pdf the implementation of the unfair contract terms directive in. It only covers exclusion clauses and not all unfair terms. Menu standard terms in b2b contracts and reasonableness print publication. A statute which imposes limits on the extent to which liability for breach of contract, negligence or other breaches of duty can be avoided by means of contractual provisions such as exclusion clauses. Start studying exemption clauses, unfair contract terms act 1977. The matter came before the court as a preliminary issue on certain question of interpretation of the contract and precise facts of the case are not given in the judgment. Ucta is only concerned with exclusion clauses, and does not examine whether a contract is unfair generally. Exclusion and limitation clauses in construction contracts recent developments. The aim of the case study is to explore methods of breaking into the language and the layout of a statute in order to look at. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. In this video i go over ucta in relation to exemption clauses.
More generally, the preamble to ucta reads as follows. The unfair contract terms act 1977 the basic purpose of ucta 1977 is to restrict the extent to which liability in a contract can be excluded for breach of contract and negligence, largely by reference to a reasonableness requirement, but in some cases by a specific prohibition. The unfair contract terms act 1977 in the court of session. Office of fair trading v abbey national and others 2008 bank charges test case.
The unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta prevents parties to a contract from excluding liability for certain matters. Other examples of unfair terms include penalty clauses where a party specifies an amount payable on breach of contract which is out of proportion to the loss that the party would suffer. Standard terms in b2b contracts and reasonableness. The unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta prohibits unfair exclusion clauses in contracts. The reasonableness test is used to evaluate an exemption clause in a number of circumstances under the ucta 1977. Section 21 of ucta 1977 states that an exclusion clause cannot be used to exclude or restrict business liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence. S6 and s7 if the party is not a consumer, s2 if the loss or damage is not personal injury or death and it is always used if s3 applies. Recent case law on the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta. The most common type of unfair terms are exclusion clauses whereby one party seeks to exclude their liability arising under the contract.
It does not apply to other terms so do not apply ucta 1977 first if not about exclusion clauses. Court of appeal rules on the application of ucta to. Parts 1 and 3 of ucta 1977 apply to england and wales. Exclusion and limitation clauses in construction contracts. The enactment of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta was a key point to english contract law. We consider two new court of appeal decisions which serve as reminders that each dispute will turn on the particular terms of the contract and the factual context, but also provide an insight into the application of the reasonableness test under the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta. Free study and revision resources for law students llb degreegdl on the english legal system. Unfair contract terms act singapore statutes online. This was the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta, which is still in force. Ucta itself defines reasonableness see below at glossary.
The unfair contract terms act 1977 is an act of parliament of the united kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. Unfair contract terms act and the case of the four exclusion clauses. Schedule 1 sets out a number of types of contracts that the key sections in part 1 do not apply to. Unfair contract terms act 1977 business to business essay. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta applies to clauses that seek to limit or exclude liability in businesstobusiness contracts. There may be nothing obviously contentious in that clause unlike the goodlife case above, this clause was ucta compliant, carving out death and personal injury but there was an express exclusion clause excluding liability in. In the complex world of liability limitation in business to business b2b contracts, the recent case of commercial management investments ltd. An act to impose further limits on the extent to which under the law of england and wales and northern ireland civil liability for breach of contract, or for negligence or other breach of duty, can be avoided by means of contract terms and otherwise. Unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta providing protection from unfair contractual terms. In the case of trident turboprop dublin limited v first flight couriers limited, the court of appeal has interpreted aspects of section 26 of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta.
This leads to a result which is more closely aligned with the parties own interests, allowing also, for an objective assessment of risk that is allocated between these parties. Whilst the courts often have to assess the reasonableness of commercial clauses, what makes this. The unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta applies to determine the enforceability of clauses which seek to restrict or exclude business liability in the majority of supply contracts. Walker morris head of commercial dispute resolution, gwendoline davies, explains the recent decision of the high court in goodlife foods v hall fire protection 1. Ucta provides, in short, that any attempt to exclude or restrict liability for death or personal injury is void and that any attempt to exclude or restrict liability for other loss is subject to the reasonableness test 2. Exclusion and limitation clauses in business contracts. As philip barnes explains, consultants and contractors, as well as suppliers, are increasingly seeking to limit their potential exposure to clients and others in the construction contracts they agree. Applies to all contractual terms not just exclusion clauses, which is the case in ucta 1977. Unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta related content. Section 32 of ucta states that a party cannot rely on a contract term to exclude or limit liability for breach except in so far as the term satisfies the requirement of.
Exclusion clauses provide certainty because they allow all. The power to override exemption clauses found to be unreasonable has been introduced in the case of implied terms in the sale of goods by the supply of goods implied terms act 1973. The reasonableness of the ucta 1977 s test of reasonableness. Unfair contract terms act 1977 1977 chapter 50 an act to impose further limits on the extent to which under the law of england and wales and northern ireland civil liability for breach of contract, of for negligence or other breach of duty, can be avoided by means of contract terms and otherwise, and under the law of scotland civil liability can be avoided by means of contract terms. Courts now have statutory power to strike out exclusion clauses due to ucta 1977, utccr 1999. Unfair contract terms act 1977 search lawindexpro for case law on this statute. An act to impose further limits on the extent to which under the law of england and wales and northern ireland civil liability for breach of contract, of for negligence or other breach of duty, can be avoided by means of contract terms and otherwise, and under the law of scotland civil liability can be avoided by means of contract terms. Unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta a ucta, ss1517 and 2021 provides that ucta applies to clauses attempting to 1 exclude or limit liability in a contract or contractual notice or 2 to render no contractual performance, or to render a performance substantially different from that which was reasonably expected from the contract. The unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta imposes statutory limits on the avoidance of civil liability through exclusion clauses in business contracts for breaches of contract, negligence, or other breaches of duty. Unfair contract terms act and the case of the four. Judge havery recited at length from the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta, including sections 31, 62 and 3, 71 and 3, 111, 2, 4 and 5 and. Ucta enabled courts to regulate unfair exclusion and limitation clauses by rendering some ineffective and by subjecting others to the reasonableness test.
It also prevents any loopholes allowing breach of contract, negligence or breach of duty. Unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta a ucta, ss1517 and 2021 provides that ucta applies to clauses attempting to 1 exclude or limit liability in a contract or contractual notice or 2 to render no. As unfair contract terms can operate oppressively, the law restricts. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. In particular, section 3 of ucta prohibits such clauses where one party deals as a consumer or enters into a contract on the other partys written standard terms of business. However, in 1993 the european council of ministers passed a directive on unfair terms on consumer contracts1 which applies with limited exceptions to unfair terms of any type in consumer contracts. A recent tcc decision has considered the application of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta to clauses within a construction subcontract imposing a requirement that claims be notified with a specified time. Two new cases provide interesting insights as to when an exclusion clause will be deemed incorporated and reasonable enough to withstand the reasonableness test of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta. Whilst we do not need to go into the facts of this case, if section 3 of. In the case of other loss or damage, a person cannot so exclude or restrict his liability for negligence except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness. The common law treatment of clauses excluding liability for negligence was discussed in section 3.
It will employ a combination of case study and analysis. Unfair contract terms act in the court of appeal womble. In addition to the protection offered by the common law, there exists statutory protection from unfair terms in the form of the unfair contracts terms act 1977, and the consumer rights act 2015. When contract liability exclusion clauses go too far. The unfair contract terms act 1977 c 50 is an act of parliament of the united kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. The directive was implemented in the uk by regulations made under the european communities act. The court considered whether each of these clauses were reasonable under the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta and therefore capable of being relied upon by ids.
The unfair contract terms act 1977 c 50 is an act of parliament of the united kingdom which. As a result of the amendments set out in schedule 4 of cra 2015, its provisions only apply to businesstobusiness contracts. Britvic soft drinks ltd v messer uk ltd 2002 ewca civ. Ucta is only concerned with exclusion clauses, and does not examine whether a. Part i goods or hirepurchase, or by section 7 of this act. The terms extend to both actual contract terms and notices that are seen to. Indeed, the stepbystep approach of the courts in tailoring section 111 of the ucta 1977 to the individual facts of each case prevents an arbitrary application of the test of reasonableness. Exclusion clauses and the reasonableness test gowling wlg. This legislation is vital in providing protection to consumers from unfair terms. Overview of the unfair contract terms act law teacher.
The case law shows that the courts have had regard to a range of. Revision note on unfair terms and exemption clauses in contract law including the unfair contract terms act 1977. This case study builds on the discussion of uk domestic legislation found in chapter 4 of legal skills, method and reasoning and considers aspects of the unfair contract terms act ucta 1977. Readers who are english commercial lawyers, and perhaps some others, will be familiar with the provisions of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ucta. There are currently no known outstanding effects for the unfair contract terms act 1977. The unfair contract terms act 1977 is the first main act, which covers some contracts that have exclusion and limitation clauses.
The unfair contract terms act 1977 applies only to businesses and does not apply to consumer contracts or consumer notices. The court also approved the trend in ucta cases which has been towards upholding terms freely agreed, particularly if the other party could have contracted elsewhere and has, or was warned to obtain, effective insurance cover which is an important point to remember when drafting contractual exclusion clauses. The unfair contract terms act referred to as ucta by business and legal insiders is a body of law designed to primarily protect consumers who may be prejudiced by the weaker bargaining positions they occupy in most consumer transactions. If it does not, dont waste time because the exclusion clause is already invalidated. Historical background the enactment of the unfair contract terms act 1977 introduced a major addition to the mechanisms for controlling exemption clauses.
153 427 313 1582 61 24 1482 302 645 1449 770 264 570 1065 342 706 406 1404 1310 7 198 1442 346 1003 243 1290 1619 962 1026 1128 874 820 1 1455 573 162 1287 825 645 150 824